Elective Decisions

The Satire Of Chris Davis

Obama Plans To Replace All 93 U.S. Attorneys On First Day In Office

with one comment

Washington—As Senator Barack Obama, D-IL, measures the drapes in the Oval Office, one of his first reported moves is to fire and replace all 93 United States Attorneys on his first day.  The decision comes from the Obama camp as it appears Senator John McCain has flamed out in the polls.

 

With the election assured, Obama feels its time to flex his muscles and make the necessary announcements.  And according to David Axelrod, Obama’s campaign strategist, “the election is over,” and it’s time to “implement change in America.”

 

The kind of change that Axelrod implies is the kind that best advances the Obama agenda.  “The strategy is very simple,” suggested Axelrod.  “We fill up the U.S. Attorneys’ offices with the most Marxist oriented attorneys we can find.  Then we begin working on the federal judges.  In a matter of eight years, we can become the U.S.S.A. (United Socialist States of America).  It sends a tingle up my leg.”

 

Senator Joseph Biden, surprised to hear of the new plan, remarked, “Only 93? Heck, there are at least that many ACORN members qualified to do the job.”

 

As attorneys are replaced, it’s only a matter of time before Obama gets to appoint the crème de la crème of the judiciary:  The U.S. Supreme Court.

 

“In the past, the courts haven’t been radical enough to tackle redistributive wealth,” quipped Obama, “but when I’m through replacing U.S. Attorneys, and appointing justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, I won’t need any action in either the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives.”

 

“And don’t think,” Obama added, “that we have forgotten Bush.  We will still prosecute the Bush administration for the release of those eight attorneys.  That was just over the top.”

 

Written by electivedecisions

October 29, 2008 at 6:34 pm

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. re: Reasons why the U.S. Attorney in New Orleans needs to be replaced

    “Several articles, including a November 12th article by T/P writer, James Gill praise U.S. Attorney Jim Letten. The articles also reverberate dismay about the loss it would be toward targeting longstanding New Orleans corruption if President-Elect Barack Obama replaced Letten in keeping with his new presidential administration. I disagree. . .

    “Letten’s tactics and potency against the average citizen easily could be as constricted, invasive, subjugating, and baseless as that time when the door of Jacques Morial, brother of Marc Morial (of the National Urban League and former mayor of New Orleans), was busted down; and the Feds maintained control of that man’s life and privacy for 3 years, but criminal charges were never lodged against Jacques. What else other than some witch hunt ‘investigation’ was that?! Letten (or his kind) could pretextly do the same to any other citizen, as Gonzales’ method of illegal wiretaps is likely also Letten’s method, but Intelligence postulated as derived from snitches for use as leverage over people to get them to say / do what benefits rich and powerful corrupt Louisianians. <<Read my entire statement about U.S. Attorney Letten at: http://timespicayuneonusattyjimletten.blogspot.com/

    Barbara Ann Jackson

    February 6, 2009 at 12:39 pm


Leave a Reply